| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Armoured C
Gallente
Federation of Freedom Fighters
Executive Outcomes
   |
Posted - 2009.01.23 16:03:00 -
[1]
all the fights i have had under the GBC name , espically in the last few days where NC have tried to clame a few system that we have had pos's in have been lag fests BUt they also have been fun
i enjoy epic large scale battles, and small speical op gangs,
i love the thrill while i wait to be bridged into system wondering what hellish wonders await on the other side, will there be caps waiting for us, will there be nothing , are they planning a DD strike, will i be primried first , do i have the right ranged ammo loaded.
I LOVE IT !!!!!
click here for the EvELife blog |
Armoured C
Gallente
Federation of Freedom Fighters
Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 00:33:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Highwind Cid
As is currently, holding 0.0 is favored by defense, as opposed to offense. What needs to be done is the opposite, make it so that being offensive favors held space. It's like 'campers' in a RTS game. All they do is sit at there base and for the most part, easily camp there position. It shouldn't be easier to defend than attack, in fact it should be the opposite. This would cause more chaos, wouldn't let people chill out and make titans like cookies, and promote pvp better. Naturally with making it more difficult to hold space, increase the rewards.
it is in favour of the attacker,
if you pos is being attacked you need to jump carriers in to rep it while have a force to shew off the invading forces, pos repping takes hours and the strong timers means that the enemy forces can regroup and come back aswell.
if a attacking force incaps all the guns and modules and the pos itself you looking upto a good few hours depending on your repping force and if your trying to do that to stop you tower going into reinforce or defending it so you can rep it up to 50% sheild to put stront in it is a hard task.
the sov combat system only defence is cyno jammers so that they have to bring BS to take a tower out but it is still favoured for the attacker.
im being nice for a week, dont be to freaked out
click here for the EvELife blog |
Armoured C
Gallente
Federation of Freedom Fighters
Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 01:23:00 -
[3]
i like it that CVA provide this service
congrats to you guys for doing a good job 
PWNING GD since 06
http://evelife.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/eve-life-new-year-tidings/[u] |
Armoured C
Gallente
Federation of Freedom Fighters
Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 01:28:00 -
[4]
cyno jammer can be shot at though so it can switch back , i think the titan pilot might be dubious about usiung it if the cyno jammer is under attack as one that drops and the titan is bubbled it is more than likely going to die
PWNING GD since 06
http://evelife.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/eve-life-new-year-tidings/[u] |
Armoured C
Gallente
Federation of Freedom Fighters
Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 01:36:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Ocih
Originally by: Armoured C
cyno jammer can be shot at though so it can switch back , i think the titan pilot might be dubious about usiung it if the cyno jammer is under attack as one that drops and the titan is bubbled it is more than likely going to die
And if you lose a sys to hostile capitals, the Titan is going down anyway. Her DDD won't be of any use against Capital fleets and she will pop with her hold full of fuel. The only reason I would use Titans would be to protect my Jammer and to remote rep it. That might just be me though. I'm also not willing to put a Titan online unless I know I can put two online becasue DDD proofing is as common as Titans.
i think most use there tian as logistic tool since the JP is veryhandy for moving fleets quickly , i think if they new system was going to be taken and risk to the titan they would have already shipped it out and that the fact is i would hope a titan have a emergency cyno incase crap hits the fan
PWNING GD since 06
http://evelife.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/eve-life-new-year-tidings/[u] |
| |
|